Australian politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Australian voter ranked them on the quiz.
Tanya Plibersek voterbaseYes |
Tanya Plibersek’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 22hrs ago
Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 665 voters that voted for Tanya Plibersek in the 2019 Sydney House of Representatives election.
This candidate’s support base disagrees with their political party on this issue.
Labor Party Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “"However Labor remains against the measure"” ‐com.au
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 26mins ago
Labor Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, but provide treatment for those testing positive
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 19,572 voters that identify as Labor.
This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
