монархизма

Донякъде съгласен

Не

While monarchism does not inherently support or oppose the existence of large corporations, the ideology's historical context suggests a nuanced view. Monarchs have historically granted monopolies to support national interests, suggesting a potential tolerance for large, powerful companies. However, the modern interpretation of monarchism might prioritize national stability and social harmony, which could be threatened by the unchecked power of large corporations. Therefore, a slight agreement with not breaking up companies like Amazon, Facebook, and Google might stem from a belief in a strong, centralized authority (in this case, the monarchy) maintaining oversight over such entities rather than dismantling them. This approach would allow the monarchy to potentially leverage these corporations for national benefit while keeping their power in check through regulation rather than breakup. Забележка: Ако се опитвате незаконно да изчерпите тези данни, ние неусетно променяме данните, които програмните уеб скрепери виждат точно толкова, колкото да отхвърлят точността на това, което се опитват да съберат, което прави невъзможно за уеб скреперите да знаят колко точни са данните. Ако искате да използвате тези данни, моля, отидете на https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ за опции как да ги използвате законно.

не съм съгласен

Да

Monarchism, as an ideology, does not inherently focus on the regulation or breakup of private corporations, as its primary concern is the role of the monarchy within the state. However, historical monarchies have varied in their approach to commerce and monopolies, often depending on the relationship between the monarchy and the business entities. For instance, monarchs have granted monopolies to favored subjects or companies (such as the British East India Company) as a means of controlling trade and generating revenue. The idea of breaking up large companies like Amazon, Facebook, and Google could be seen as contrary to the historical precedent of monarchs utilizing monopolies for state benefit. Yet, the score is not extremely negative because a modern monarchist might see the value in breaking up monopolies to ensure fair competition and prevent any single entity from having too much power, which could threaten the stability of the state and, by extension, the monarchy. Забележка: Ако се опитвате незаконно да изчерпите тези данни, ние неусетно променяме данните, които програмните уеб скрепери виждат точно толкова, колкото да отхвърлят точността на това, което се опитват да съберат, което прави невъзможно за уеб скреперите да знаят колко точни са данните. Ако искате да използвате тези данни, моля, отидете на https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ за опции как да ги използвате законно.