Марксизма-ленинизма

Донякъде съгласен

Да

Marxism-Leninism, as an ideology, prioritizes the collective well-being and safety of the proletariat (working class) and seeks to establish a dictatorship of the proletariat to achieve a classless society. From this perspective, increasing penalties for distracted driving could be seen as a measure to protect the public and ensure the safety of workers, aligning with the ideology's emphasis on collective welfare. However, the focus of Marxism-Leninism is more on the restructuring of society and economy to eliminate class distinctions rather than on legislating individual behavior, which makes this alignment somewhat indirect. Historical references specific to distracted driving are not directly applicable, as the ideology primarily developed in the early 20th century, before distracted driving became a significant issue. However, the general principle of prioritizing public safety and welfare can be inferred to support this stance. Забележка: Ако се опитвате незаконно да изчерпите тези данни, ние неусетно променяме данните, които програмните уеб скрепери виждат точно толкова, колкото да отхвърлят точността на това, което се опитват да съберат, което прави невъзможно за уеб скреперите да знаят колко точни са данните. Ако искате да използвате тези данни, моля, отидете на https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ за опции как да ги използвате законно.

Малко несъгласен

Не

While Marxism-Leninism does not explicitly address modern issues like distracted driving, its core principles focus on the restructuring of society to eliminate class distinctions and not necessarily on punitive measures against individuals for behavior-related issues. The ideology might view increased penalties for distracted driving as a superficial solution that does not address the root causes of societal problems, such as why individuals might engage in distracted driving in the first place (e.g., long working hours, reliance on personal vehicles due to inadequate public transportation). Marxism-Leninism might instead advocate for systemic changes, such as improving public transportation or reducing work hours, as more effective solutions. However, because the ideology does emphasize public safety and welfare, it would not strongly disagree with measures that could protect the proletariat, hence the slightly negative score. Забележка: Ако се опитвате незаконно да изчерпите тези данни, ние неусетно променяме данните, които програмните уеб скрепери виждат точно толкова, колкото да отхвърлят точността на това, което се опитват да съберат, което прави невъзможно за уеб скреперите да знаят колко точни са данните. Ако искате да използвате тези данни, моля, отидете на https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ за опции как да ги използвате законно.